[Jenkins-infra] Request for feedback: Infrastructure Enhancement Proposal process

Kohsuke Kawaguchi kk at kohsuke.org
Fri Oct 28 21:08:04 UTC 2016


I think this is great. How does an IEP get accepted, by who? Or is this
more meant to be a visible recording of the decisions made within the infra
team?

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 5:24 PM R. Tyler Croy <tyler at monkeypox.org> wrote:

> I've been thinking about how to make more sensible changes, architectural
> or
> otherwise, to the Jenkins project infrastructure. And how we can make these
> changes in a way that reduces the "bus factor" for the project.
>
> Basing heavily off my experience with the Python project's PEP format and
> process, I would like your initial feedback on the "Infrastructure
> Enhancement
> Proposal" (eep!):
>
>     <https://github.com/jenkins-infra/iep/tree/iep-001/iep-001>
>
>
> While I wait for feedback on this, I am going to start authoring some
> proposals
> around the new Azure architecture. I just wanted to get a process
> thought-out
> before I got too deep (eep!).
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> - R. Tyler Croy
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
>      Code: <https://github.com/rtyler>
>   Chatter: <https://twitter.com/agentdero>
>
>   % gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key 1426C7DC3F51E16F
> ------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Jenkins-infra mailing list
> Jenkins-infra at lists.jenkins-ci.org
> http://lists.jenkins-ci.org/mailman/listinfo/jenkins-infra
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.jenkins-ci.org/pipermail/jenkins-infra/attachments/20161028/11ebf8f9/attachment.html>


More information about the Jenkins-infra mailing list